Can the Texas-Style Workers Compensation Nightmare Come to Alabama?

If you want to understand the brick wall facing injured workers seeking medical treatment in some states just read the recent article published in the ABA Journal.  The title says it all --

Insult to Injury:  Texas Workers' Comp System Denies, Delays Medical Help

The article begins by telling the story of a Deputy Sheriff who faced a nightmare of denials and delays in his medical care after being shot while in the line of duty.  Those issues included the carrier even claiming the emergency helicopter ride to the hospital for life-saving care was not necessary.

This is not acceptable.  The article paints a picture of Texas where the system may be at its worst.  However, these problems are not unique to Texas.  They occur in Alabama as well.  In the last few years, they have progressively worsened.

The primary purpose of workers' compensation laws is to rehabilitate injured workers so they may return to gainful employment if possible.  More and more, we are losing our focus on this purpose.  I hear it from my clients daily - "I want to work.  I have to get medical treatment."  Yet, they are often frustrated by a system that seems to work against providing medical care.

Clearly, the workers compensation carriers are cutting their costs at the expense of those with serious injuries.  Yet, I would not call this a cost "saving" measure.  Instead, it is a cost "shifting" measure.  The reality is, workers compensation carriers are shifting the costs from themselves to the rest of us.  Medical costs for work-related injuries should be paid out of the large premiums collected by carriers.  Instead, when legitimate claims are denied or delayed, others shoulder those costs.  As taxpayers, we often pay those costs through programs such are Medicare or Medicaid.  On another level, families sometimes become overburdened by the costs of getting basic care and the loss of income while out of work.

The article quotes a recently retired Texas official who spent his career handling workers compensation issues and best expressed the carrier misconduct that frustrates injured workers and the medical system so greatly.  According to this official:

Sometimes they just create a controversy as to whether they owe on a claim.

What are some of the common actions taken by carriers to create a bad reason for denying care?  What practices are used to wrongfully deny or delay medical treatment to injured workers?  Here are a few:

  1. Claim A Pre-Existing Problem.  I have written about this issue previously.  Don't simply accept such a denial if you were able to do your job before suffering a work-related injury.  It is not necessary that you have been in perfect health before that injury.
  2. Bury The Doctor in Paperwork.  Doctors should spend most of their time treating patients not completing forms.  I have seen far too many cases where the doctor eventually became frustrated and simply gave up because of the level of paperwork required for a claim to get approved.  If your doctor has talked to you about your injury and the need for medical care, then he has most likely put those opinions in your medical records.  That should be sufficient.
  3. Use The "Utilization Review" Process.  Alabama law has an administrative review process that was created to evaluate medical issues that are unclear for a variety of legitimate reasons.  Yet, carriers often use the review process as a means to delay or deny legitimate care.  How is this process abused?  Sometimes, the carrier will use it to place extra paperwork burdens on the treating doctor.  Sometimes, the carrier will pay another medical provider for a negative opinion about the requested medical care.  This is called "peer review."  However, it is really just a negative report purchased from someone who never examined you, may not have seen all your records, and may not even be the right type of specialist for your injury.  You don't have to accept the delays or denials of this process.  Instead, you can seek a remedy in court in Alabama.
  4. Employ A Bad Case Nurse To Work The System.  Let me start by saying that there are plenty of good nurses that try to help injured workers navigate a difficult medical system.  The bad ones gather information to use against you, try to manipulate the doctors, and work to slow the process.  Good or bad, they all approach with a smile and promises of help.  Since you cannot tell the difference, my advice is to act with caution.  Be friendly but do not provide personal information.  Don't discuss your family, job history, finances, or other health issues and injuries.  Keep your discussions to scheduling your next appointment and making sure the treatment requested by the doctor is getting approved quickly.
  5. Require Multiple Opinions.  Alabama law does give the workers compensation carrier some rights to get a second medical opinion.  However, some carriers abuse this limited right by requiring you to get multiple opinions until the carrier gets one it likes.  Another way some carriers abuse this right is by using it as a means to switch your care from a doctor you may like to one more favorable to the carrier.  The carrier cannot legitimately do that and you should not accept it.

Too often employees suffering significant injuries are left without proper medical care because of carrier misconduct.  That is not acceptable.  That is why it is so important to stay alert to these issues that benefit the bad carriers at the expense of everyone else.

 

Our Courts Continue to Allow Foreign Manufacturers to Escape Justice

Yesterday, I read a blog post by Mobile, Alabama attorney Edwin Lamberth.  Edwin's blog is always a great source of commentary.  Edwin's recent post discusses an important issue - foreign companies not being held accountable for the injuries and deaths caused by their defective and dangerous products.

This is a subject I've previously addressed as well.  In my prior posts, I discussed the need for Congress to pass legislation protecting the public from needless injuries by holding these manufacturers accountable.  Last year, such legislation was introduced before Congress.  That proposed legislation would not only protect consumers but would also level the playing field for manufacturers in the U.S. who are going the extra mile to try and produce safe products.

Now, the U.S. Supreme Court has weighed into the issue - but with two bad decisions that deny justice to the victims of defective and dangerous products produced by foreign companies for distribution in the United States.  Edwin's post presents a great analysis and commentary on these new decisions.  Since his post captures my thoughts on the issue as well, I would just urge others to read it.  I am very troubled by these recent Court decisions further closing the doors of justice to families dealing with a severe personal injury or the death of a loved one due to a dangerous and defective product.  I certainly hope this is not the end of this issue.  Perhaps now Congress will finally act in the interests of the public and business by passing legislation to hold those accountable who ship defective products to us.

Four Tips To Consider When the Workers' Compensation Carrier Has a Lien on Your Client's Lawsuit

In Alabama, if you are injured on the job then you are entitled to workers' compensation benefits from your employer.  Each state has some form of workers' compensation system.  As a result, the benefits provided to injured workers can vary from state to state.  Although some large employers are self-insured, most purchase insurance coverage to cover the benefits required by a state's workers' compensation system.

An injured employee can obtain workers' compensation benefits regardless of fault.  However, Alabama law also allows the injured worker to pursue a legal claim against another party who may have caused the injury.  Here is an example -- You are a delivery driver.  You are on the job, driving the company truck, when another driver runs a red light and crashes into your vehicle.  You are hurt.  Under Alabama's workers' compensation system, your employer must provide you medical care and may also have to pay you certain disability benefits set out in the law.  Wait, the collision was really caused by the other driver.  If so, then you can pursue a claim against that other driver.  The workers' compensation system does not provide full compensation for all your damages.  However, you can pursue a claim against the other driver for all your damages.  These cases are commonly referred to as third-party claims by attorneys.

One issue in the scenario I just mentioned where you are hurt on the job due to the fault of another is that the workers' compensation carrier has a lien against your recovery from the responsible person.  That is, if your employer or its insurance company paid benefits for medical treatment or disability, they are entitled to get their money back if you successfully recover damages from the responsible party.  This is a complicated issue and it is important that the lawyer handling such a case have a full understanding of this area of the law.  Although complex, here are several quick tips to consider when handling this type of case:

  1. Verify the claimed lien. -- In every case, I ask the insurance carrier for a print-out of all payments.  I often find that the print-out lists administrative and investigation expenses incurred by the carrier.  The carrier's lien only applies to actual expenses for medical or disability payments.  By reviewing the actual payments which comprise the claimed lien you can often eliminate amounts that should not be collected.  Many attorneys simply accept the carrier's statement as to the total lien amount without reviewing all the payments.  You can often save your client considerable money just by performing this simple task.
  2. Bring the workers' compensation adjuster to the trial of your other case. -- When I go to trial in a third party case, I typically present the claims adjuster as a witness.  Since the insurance carrier often has a considerable lien, they should not mind sending a representative to trial.  I have found, however, that the carrier is rarely asked to send its adjuster to trial.  I cannot understand why many lawyers would not do this.  I have spoken with jurors after several of these trials and they have all indicated that having an adjuster testify to the significant amount of money spent to treat your client's injuries as well as the fact that they have a lien, has a great impact.  This witness, if handled correctly, can have a tremendous impact in validating the extent of your client's serious injuries.
  3. Keep the workers' compensation carrier informed as to all difficulties and problems with your other case so that they will be in a position to negotiate with you in an effort to reduce the lien. -- Too many attorneys ignore this issue until there is a settlement in their third-party case.  Then, they call the adjuster handling the claim expecting to negotiate a reduction in the lien.  Whenever I have a third-party case, I periodically call the adjuster to talk about any difficulties with the case.  If you truly have a difficult third-party case where you might need to compromise in order to settle, don't you think the carrier might be in a better position to also compromise its lien if you have informed them of the issues along the way?
  4. Seek discovery of any contracts between your employer and the other party if they had any prior relationship.  -- This is a great issue.  Many third-party cases arise out of construction work or work in an industrial setting.  In order to do this work, your client's employer will often enter into a contract with another business.  If that other business (or one of its employees) caused the injury, make sure you get a copy of the contract.  I have found that these contracts sometimes contain clauses where one party agrees to waive any claims against the other or against any money paid by the other.  Sometimes, these waiver clauses specifically waive liens.  If so, you can argue that there is no lien.  I have successfully argued this on a prior occasion before a trial court in Alabama.  One warning here, however, is that Alabama's Supreme Court has not addressed these clauses, including the issue of whether an employer can waive the lien of its insurance carrier.  This is an interesting issue for appeal.

The issues surrounding liens are often complex.  Too many attorneys either don't understand the issues or don't take the time to deal with them.  However, they are very important issues to consider when handling a claim.  Dealing with these issues correctly can often save your injured client significant money.